Storyboard
33 scenes, 8:14 at 150 words per minute including pauses. Narration is copied from the script; every chart value and on-screen citation is checked against a passage.
1. sc01 · 0:00 to 0:08 typography
Picture the coldest night of a northern winter: frost on the windows, and the heat pump outside still humming.
Visual. Deep blue field; "The coldest night" settles in large type, frost-white, as the sentence begins.
On screen. The coldest night
2. sc02 · 0:08 to 0:17 typography
Is it still heating the house, or has it turned into a very expensive space heater? Meters, not marketing, can settle this.
Visual. The question types on, centred; "very expensive space heater" turns amber as it is spoken.
On screen. Still heating, or a very expensive space heater?
3. sc03 · 0:17 to 0:25 typography
An NH Patch headline put the doubt bluntly: "Taxpayers On The Hook For Tech That Falls Flat In The Cold".
Visual. Quote card, text only; "Falls Flat In The Cold" turns red as it is spoken.
On screen. "Taxpayers On The Hook For Tech That Falls Flat In The Cold"
Cite. NH Patch headline
4. sc04 · 0:25 to 0:34 typography
The Mass Save heat pump page answers that "many provide efficient heat at outdoor temperatures as low as -15 °F".
Visual. Quote card, text only, mirrored from the previous one; "-15 °F" turns green as it is spoken.
On screen. "many provide efficient heat at outdoor temperatures as low as -15 °F"
Cite. Mass Save heat pump page
5. sc05 · 0:34 to 0:42 typography
So does a heat pump give up in the cold, or carry on as if nothing happened?
Visual. The question types on; "give up" in red, "carry on" in green.
On screen. Give up in the cold, or carry on?
6. sc06 · 0:42 to 0:52 typography
Start with the bluntest question: does the heat keep coming at all? Engineers score heating efficiency as a COP, and plain electric resistance heat scores 1.
Visual. Two lines build one per sentence: the question first, then "Resistance heat: COP 1" with the 1 held large.
On screen. Does the heat keep coming? / Resistance heat: COP 1
Cite. CEE, 2018 Minnesota field assessment
7. sc07 · 0:52 to 1:21 data-chart
In one evaluation, engineers metered the heat that dozens of ductless mini-splits delivered over back-to-back winters, and in the later one the units averaged a COP of 1.5 between -10 and 0 °F. That is 50 percent more heat per unit of electricity than resistance heat, which the evaluators called far superior; in the earlier winter, with deep snow and ice around the outdoor units, the units ran less efficiently.
Visual. Three tiles: resistance heat COP 1, metered mini-splits COP 1.5, and 50% more heat per unit of electricity; each lands as it is spoken.
| Resistance heat COP | 1 | 1 | count | CEE 2018, ducted and ductless cold-climate heat pumps in the field, lines 425-L435 |
| Mini-splits, later winter, average COP | 1.5 | 1.5 | count | Cadmus 2016, ductless mini-split evaluation (MA and RI), lines 2926-L2935 |
| More heat per unit of electricity | 50% | 50 | percent | Cadmus 2016, ductless mini-split evaluation (MA and RI), lines 2926-L2935 |
Cite. Cadmus, 2016 ductless mini-split evaluation
8. sc08 · 1:21 to 1:29 typography
And not only the cold-climate models: the ordinary ones in that evaluation also ran below 0 °F, just less efficiently.
Visual. One line; "below 0 °F" holds in ice blue.
On screen. Ordinary ones ran below 0 °F too
Cite. Cadmus, 2016 ductless mini-split evaluation
9. sc09 · 1:29 to 1:55 data-chart
A newer field test followed prototype cold-climate heat pumps, and leaving out the periods when backup heat or defrost was running, their median COP between 0 and 5 °F was 1.9. Those prototypes tested better in the lab, but in the field most still beat 1.75, the COP the EPA's Energy Star label requires of a cold-climate heat pump at 5 °F.
Visual. Two tiles: median field COP 1.9 at 0 to 5 °F, then the Energy Star requirement 1.75 at 5 °F beside it.
| Median COP, 0 to 5 °F | 1.9 | 1.9 | count | PNNL 2025, DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge field results, lines 180-L189 |
| Energy Star requirement at 5 °F | 1.75 | 1.75 | count | PNNL 2025, DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge field results, lines 180-L189 |
Cite. PNNL, 2025 cold-climate heat pump field test
10. sc10 · 1:55 to 2:01 transition
So the heat keeps coming. But efficiency is only half of it.
Visual. Split field: "Efficiency" on the left dims, "Output" on the right lights up.
On screen. Efficiency / Output
11. sc11 · 2:01 to 2:08 typography
As the channel Technology Connections puts it, "along with getting less efficient, their actual heat output also drops."
Visual. Quote card, text only; "heat output also drops" turns amber.
On screen. "along with getting less efficient, their actual heat output also drops."
Cite. Technology Connections, YouTube
12. sc12 · 2:08 to 2:31 data-chart
In northern Minnesota, researchers watched one small ductless unit hold a steady median output from 10 °F all the way down to -15 °F. Below that it kept running at reduced output, and at -20 °F and colder it delivered only about 20 percent of what it was rated for at 5 °F.
Visual. One large tile: about 20% of rated output at -20 °F and colder, landing on "20 percent".
| Output at -20 to -25 °F, share of its rating at 5 °F | 20% | about 20 | percent | CEE 2018, ducted and ductless cold-climate heat pumps in the field, lines 478-L489 |
Cite. CEE, 2018 Minnesota field assessment
13. sc13 · 2:31 to 2:38 document-excerpt
The researchers' verdict was that units like it should not be used without backup below -15 °F.
Visual. The report passage scrolls in; the line about not using these units without backup highlights.
Cite. CEE, 2018 Minnesota field assessment
14. sc14 · 2:38 to 2:53 data-chart
Efficiency follows the same slope: in the same Minnesota research, outdoor temperature had the biggest effect on COP, and heat-pump-only cycles managed only around 1.3 at 10 °F, less than half what they reached on mild days.
Visual. Two tiles: COP around 1.3 at 10 °F in cold blue, COP 3.0 to 4.5 on mild days in warm orange.
| At 10 °F | 1.3 | about 1.3 | count | CEE 2017, cold-climate heat pumps in Minnesota, lines 1143-L1157 |
| Mild days, 50 to 60 °F | 3.0 to 4.5 | about 4.5 | count | CEE 2017, cold-climate heat pumps in Minnesota, lines 1143-L1157 |
Cite. CEE, 2017 Minnesota cold-climate heat pump study
15. sc15 · 2:53 to 3:10 document-excerpt
Then there is the frost. In cold, humid air, frost builds up on the outdoor coil, and to melt it the heat pump runs in reverse, pulling heat out of the house, which can cool the air coming out of the vents.
Visual. The PNNL defrost passage scrolls in; the line about rejecting heat from the conditioned space highlights.
Cite. PNNL, 2025 field test, defrost
16. sc16 · 3:10 to 3:26 data-chart
In the prototype field test, defrost used a median of 5 to 8 percent of the energy at the temperatures where it cost most, a small share, though one site spent 16 percent of its time in defrost.
Visual. Two tiles: median defrost share of energy 5% to 8%, then the outlier site's 16% of time in defrost in amber.
| Median share of energy, 5 to 35 °F | 5% to 8% | 8 | percent | PNNL 2025, DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge field results, lines 1249-L1310 |
| One site's time in defrost | 16% | 16 | percent | PNNL 2025, DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge field results, lines 1249-L1310 |
Cite. PNNL, 2025 field test, defrost
17. sc17 · 3:26 to 3:29 typography
Which brings us to the real catch: backup heat.
Visual. One line punches in; "backup heat" in red.
On screen. The real catch: backup heat
18. sc18 · 3:29 to 3:37 typography
When a heat pump's electric backup strips kick in, Jordan Dearden warns, "They'll also absolutely destroy your electric bill."
Visual. Quote card, text only; "destroy your electric bill" turns red.
On screen. "They'll also absolutely destroy your electric bill."
Cite. Jordan Dearden, YouTube
19. sc19 · 3:37 to 4:01 data-chart
In the prototype test, the units ran mostly on the heat pump alone, even at the lowest temperatures, and backup-only operation was minimal above 0 °F. But in the coldest range with enough data, below 0 °F, backup elements were on 25 percent of the time, and only some of the 22 sites had enough data that cold.
Visual. Two tiles: 25% of the time with backup on below 0 °F, and the 22 sites in the study, the second tile smaller.
| Time with backup on, -10 to 0 °F | 25% | 25 | percent | PNNL 2025, DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge field results, lines 1169-L1193 |
| Sites in the study | 22 | 22 | count | PNNL 2025, DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge field results, lines 1169-L1193 |
Cite. PNNL, 2025 field test, backup heat
20. sc20 · 4:01 to 4:15 typography
Some backup use came from the thermostat: backup heat began at around 30 to 35 °F, and the researchers expect it would start much lower without homeowners changing setpoints, or with smarter thermostat controls.
Visual. One line; "30 to 35 °F" in amber.
On screen. Backup began at 30 to 35 °F
Cite. PNNL, 2025 field test, switchover
21. sc21 · 4:15 to 4:28 document-excerpt
Some came from faults: two sites fired up higher stages of backup heat during defrost, at least one did it in normal heating too, and the manufacturer called that a controls problem.
Visual. The PNNL passage on defrost strategies scrolls in; the manufacturer's controls-problem line highlights.
Cite. PNNL, 2025 field test, defrost
22. sc22 · 4:28 to 4:43 typography
In the Minnesota study's all-electric system, the resistance booster joined in below 30 °F, yet because the heat pump ran first, the whole system still beat plain resistance heat even at the coldest reading, around -7 °F.
Visual. One line; "-7 °F" in ice blue.
On screen. Still beat resistance heat at -7 °F
Cite. CEE, 2018 Minnesota field assessment
23. sc23 · 4:43 to 4:57 typography
In another field study, one site's compressor would not run below 0 °F at all, even with its lockout disabled, most likely because of an on-board control setting that cannot be adjusted in the field.
Visual. One line; "below 0 °F" in red.
On screen. One compressor would not run below 0 °F
Cite. NREL, 2023 cold-climate field validation
24. sc24 · 4:57 to 5:18 data-chart
Sizing matters too: one study estimated that in Minnesota a high-efficiency heat pump sized for the full heating load cut median bills by $182 a year, while one sized for the cooling load raised them by $96, because it leaned harder on electric resistance backup.
Visual. Two tiles: $182 a year saved in green for heating-load sizing, $96 a year more in red for cooling-load sizing.
| Sized for heating: saved | $182/year | 182 | usd | Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all?, lines 942-L946 |
| Sized for cooling: raised | $96/year | 96 | usd | Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all?, lines 942-L946 |
Cite. Wilson et al., 2024 heat pump bill model
25. sc25 · 5:18 to 5:34 data-chart
So what does all this do to the bill? For the Minnesota homes, which had heated with propane or electricity, the researchers used performance maps and typical Minnesota weather to estimate cost savings of 30 to 56 percent.
Visual. One tile: estimated savings of 30% to 56% against propane or electric heat.
| Estimated cost savings | 30% to 56% | 56 | percent | CEE 2018, ducted and ductless cold-climate heat pumps in the field, lines 495-L518 |
Cite. CEE, 2018 Minnesota field assessment
26. sc26 · 5:34 to 5:56 data-chart
Gas is harder to beat: at the prices of those winters, the mini-splits from the first evaluation cost less to run than an 80 percent efficient gas system only above 70 °F, which the evaluators said made them no direct replacement for gas. Against propane, they were cheaper at every temperature.
Visual. One tile: the break-even outdoor temperature against 80% efficient gas, above 70 °F, in red; it dims as s35 turns to propane.
| Against 80% efficient gas | 70°F | gt 70 | count | Cadmus 2016, ductless mini-split evaluation (MA and RI), lines 3436-L3459 |
Cite. Cadmus, 2016 ductless mini-split evaluation
27. sc27 · 5:56 to 6:10 data-chart
Even the measured units listed as cold-climate broke even with gas only above 58 °F; on paper, the rating curve of a then-current cold-climate model brought it down to between 28 and 40 °F.
Visual. Three tiles: measured cold-climate units above 58 °F, then the rated model at 40 °F and 28 °F, the paper tiles outlined rather than filled.
| Measured units | 58°F | gt 58 | count | Cadmus 2016, ductless mini-split evaluation (MA and RI), lines 3436-L3459 |
| Rating curve, 2015 winter | 40°F | 40 | count | Cadmus 2016, ductless mini-split evaluation (MA and RI), lines 3436-L3459 |
| Rating curve, 2016 winter | 28°F | 28 | count | Cadmus 2016, ductless mini-split evaluation (MA and RI), lines 3436-L3459 |
Cite. Cadmus, 2016 ductless mini-split evaluation
28. sc28 · 6:10 to 6:41 typography
A cost model for Toronto and Edmonton that counts equipment as well as energy points the same way: in Toronto, standard heat pumps with gas backup came out the lowest-cost option for nearly all households, but in Edmonton that held only for some house types, and gas with air conditioning won the rest. The model's reasons were cheap gas and the cold itself, which makes heat pumps less efficient and calls on the backup more.
Visual. Two lines build one per sentence: Toronto in green, Edmonton in amber.
On screen. Toronto: heat pumps with gas backup / Edmonton: cheap gas and the cold
Cite. Canadian Climate Institute, 2023 cost model
29. sc29 · 6:41 to 6:46 typography
So do heat pumps still work when it gets really cold?
Visual. The question types on, centred.
On screen. Do heat pumps still work when it gets really cold?
30. sc30 · 6:46 to 7:09 typography
In these field tests most units did: they kept heating below zero, with less efficiency and less output, and still got more heat from each unit of electricity than resistance heat. The catch is backup heat, which ran more as it got colder, and more where a unit was sized for cooling or its controls misbehaved.
Visual. Two lines build one per sentence: the first in green, the second in amber.
On screen. Most kept heating below zero / The catch is backup heat
Cite. Cadmus 2016; CEE 2018; NREL 2023; PNNL 2025 field tests
31. sc31 · 7:09 to 7:33 typography
And do they still save money? Against propane or electric heat, the studies here say yes on running costs, though the Minnesota researchers put retrofit paybacks at over 10 years unless the old system needs replacing; against gas, it turns on the unit, the climate and local prices, and for the mini-splits measured in the first evaluation, gas won.
Visual. Two lines build one per sentence: "Save money?" then "Against gas: it turns on the unit, climate and prices".
On screen. Do they still save money? / Against gas: it turns on the unit, the climate and prices
Cite. CEE 2018; Cadmus 2016; Canadian Climate Institute 2023
32. sc32 · 7:33 to 7:44 typography
Each of these field tests followed a limited number of units, so they show what heat pumps can do in the cold, not what every installation will.
Visual. One line, smaller and grey.
On screen. A limited number of units
33. sc33 · 7:44 to 8:14 typography
If your winters bite, ask the installer whether the unit is a cold-climate model, and whether it is sized for your heating load or only for your cooling. Ask what temperature the backup is set to start at, then keep the thermostat steady and watch how often the backup comes on. And if you heat with gas, work out the break-even temperature at your own prices before you decide what the furnace is for.
Visual. Three lines build one per sentence, as a checklist.
On screen. Cold-climate model, sized for heating / When the backup starts / Break-even at your own prices